| Tragic events in 2004 in Tashkent and
Bukhara region undoubtedly showed that independent Uzbekistan became one of
the main objects of development and spread of radical Islamic ideology.
Explosions in Uzbekistan is not the next link of the tragic chain of
terrorist acts, committed throughout the world, but in many cases have
determinant meaning for creating a new strategy in the war against
international terrorism.
First of all, in terrorist acts which took place in Uzbekistan the female
suicide-bombers were used for the first time, which shows the strengthening
of influence in the region of radical Islam with the Middle East roots. But
this also gives the impression to assume about the widening geography of
using of women committing terrorist attacks, which seriously decreasing the
insurance of any state of the world from this threat.
Secondly, according to the facts, attacks were not directed to the citizens
of western countries or infidels, targets for the attack were their own
compatriots and coreligionists. This fact clearly indicates that in
achieving their goals terrorists now are ready to kill even people, not
standing religion, culture 2 nation.
Thirdly, many testimonies of arrested terrorists and their links, results of
conducted searches and seizure of explosives components, fire arms and a lot
of religious literature, leaflets, audio and video tapes, and also direct
statement of participants of terrorist acts gives more than convincing proof
to assume that “Hizb Ut Tahrir” has connection to the explosions.
In spite of the aspiration of some Hizb ut-Tahrir leaders to give up from
the actions in Uzbekistan, as well as statements of several political
experts, sympathizing to this radicals because of their “guiltlessness”,
only one fact, that exactly the house of the member of Hizb ut-Tahrir
N.Razzakov in Romitan district of Bukhara region was the place for storing
fire arms and explosives, totally undermine the declared image of this
network as non terrorist organization.
From the other side, the main aim of Hizb ut-Tahrir on overthrowing the
secular governments of Central Asian countries and their replacement by the
single “Khalifate” doesn’t need additional comments to be assured that in
recent years the real transformation of methods of its actions occurred.
Therefore the issue whether Hizb ut-Tahrir is using violence for achieving
its goals is of crucial importance in the context of global war against
terrorism.
Hizb ut-Tahrir has been established in 1952 in Jordan by Palestinian judge Taki Ud-din Nabahani. He graduated from University Al-Azhar in Egypt, the
leading Islamic educational establishment, which had been under negative
influence of radical teaching of “vahhabits” during the decade.
Nabahani was the member of extremists organization “Muslim brothers” and
after the set up of state of Israel in 1948 he became refugee in Eastern
Jerusalem governed by Jordanians. There he founded HUT and attracted the
Palestinian youth in its ranks and began to propagandize the anti-Semitic
ideas. In particular the idea of HUT on creation of worldwide “Khalifate”,
which would unite all the Muslims without borders became the most popular
among Palestinians. After failed attempts of riots in Jordan and Egypt HUT
was prohibited practically in all Middle East countries. It is an evidence
that HUT from the moment of its creation practiced the methods of
overthrowing the existing state authorities in the native Muslim states.
Although at that time also HUT was claiming that it was not accepting the
violent way of taking power.
Therefore HUT moved to Western Europe where began to gain profits from
liberal societies, allowing freedom of speech and actions, including those
which create hostility and hatred among people.
After collapse of the USSR, Hizb ut-Tahrir began to enlarge actively the
influence on the countries of Central Asia where people always had a need to
study an Islam, but there was lack of information resources. Now Hizb ut
Tahrir is active all over the world, including in the USA. Its necessary to
emphasize, that declared by Hizb ut Tahrir members nonviolent principles of
activity have essentially influenced to favorable recognition of this sect
by the United States and the West-European states, but outside of their
vision was a true side of its activity (except Germany, where Hizb ut Tahrir
have been forbidden for anti-Semitism). However eventually, especially on
boundary of the XX-XXI centuries, leading world powers began to realize
progressing danger from this extremist organization of HUT to the civilized
development. Practically behind each of executed act of terrorism invariably
appeared Hizb ut Tahrir ideas and force.
So, at the special seminar organized recently by the Center of R.Nikson, the
international experts and law-enforcement structures have converged in
opinion, that Hizb ut Tahrir is the conveyor for creating terrorists. But
not all of Hizb ut Tahrir members directly have been involved in acts of
terrorism. Hizb ut Tahrir makes thousand people who share the doctrine of
sect and fill up numbers of the groups such as Al-Kaeda.
The facts from the international practice convincingly testify, that for
example, militant of Al-Kaeda Abdu Musab al-Zarkavi who has the Jordanian
origin was a member of Hizb ut Tahrir, and after training in Afghanistan, he
has introduced its ideology to Iraq. One of leaders of Al-Kaeda Hamid sheikh
Mohammad also has been connected with Hizb ut-Tahrir. Other known terrorist
Omar Sajed Muhammad, the murderer of journalist Deniel Pearl though was not
Hizb ut-Tahrir member, but this organization has provided to him access to
terrorist groupings and has blessed on murder.
Hizb ut-Tahrir is not carrying out the terrorist acts directly, but it is
pushing the people to commit the forcible actions. That is why the attempts
of leaders of Hizb ut-Tahrir to dissociate from the terrorist actions,
trying to draw away the attention of the public, and making accents
intentionally on its non-participation in practical realization of terrorist
acts are absolutely groundless.
Generally speaking, Hizb ut-Tahrir is relatively small organization (in
Uzbekistan, by some accounts, the number of its members runs to 10.000
people), but it is trying to raise the Muslim consciousness to real actions,
acting as “advance guard”. Namely Hizb ut-Tahrir was calling to hijacking
airplanes, but the organization did not carry out these actions itself. It
sanctioned killings of Jewish, Americans, British, Russians, as “kafirs’ as
well as faithless Muslims, who are not supporting their ideas, though it
preferred to not “soil the hands by blood”.
It is necessary to note, that Hizb ut-Tahrir uses different strategies in
different countries. For example, Hizb ut-Tahrir is appealing in USA and
Europe to educated Muslims, who are holding the scientific levels, and who
want to be politically active. In that way, higher intellectual level of
members of Hizb ut-Tahrir is achieving, in comparison with ordinary rebels
of other organizations. Besides that, the facts of appeals of Hizb ut-Tahrir
to Marxist-Leninist, anti-American and anti-Jewish organizations, well known
in Europe, were fixed.
The Hizb ut-Tahrir organization is counting on the youth, and namely on
rural youth in Central Asia, particularly, in Uzbekistan. But one could
establish the versatility in Hizb ut-Tahrir’s tactics, which is taking into
account the regional peculiarities, the way of life, mentality, the
demographic specificities, the social problems and even the condition of
realization of economic reforms. For example, the most common activity of
Hizb ut-Tahrir is conducting observations in the regions of Ferghana Valley,
city of Tashkent, Tashkent, Surkhandaria and Kashkadaria regions in view of
more devotion of people to religion, density of population, development of
infrastructure and existence of common borders with contiguous countries.
The last circumstance allows to Hizb ut-Tahrir to provide mobility of
transferences of its members, as it was at the end of 1990’s, when because
of measures of law enforcement bodies of Uzbekistan on cutting short their
activities, they forcedly moved to the southern regions of Kazakhstan and
Kyrgyzstan and to Tajikistan.
Under conditions in Uzbekistan Hizb ut-Tahrir attempting to involve to the
sphere of joint activities of different “human rights activists” and
“oppositionists”, including their foreign representatives and sponsors.
Manipulating skillfully on subject of human rights and persecution of
believers in Uzbekistan, Hizb ut-Tahrir on the one hand, attempting to
“join” to the international grants and create visibility of scale of its
activities, and on other hand – using inexperience home-bred demagogues and
their political failure, under aegis of “remedial” try to get mass character
of its influence.
Lately Hizb ut-Tahrir permanently changing its tactics, diverges from its
initial principles on seizure of power by peaceful methods, mostly inclining
to the method of quick achievement of aims by any means, including armed. In
this perspective, Hizb ut-Tahrir finally turns into ideological base on
training of Muslims for terrorist organizations such IMU.
|